<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Office and Business Productivity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be</link>
	<description>SharePoint, GTD and beyond</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:44:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Email and Nozbe : One page to master it all by Patrick Sledz</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/08/using-email-and-nozbe-one-page-to-rule-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1558</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sledz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=277#comment-1558</guid>
		<description>Hi Justin,

Can you try to leave the &quot;on&quot; out of your e-mail line. 
Like 
* Follow up Faithword account creation for CSS @computer next week %15 min
Please also make sure that you press ENTER  after the last word (in this case min)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Justin,</p>
<p>Can you try to leave the &#8220;on&#8221; out of your e-mail line.<br />
Like<br />
* Follow up Faithword account creation for CSS @computer next week %15 min<br />
Please also make sure that you press ENTER  after the last word (in this case min)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Email and Nozbe : One page to master it all by Justin Lugbill</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/08/using-email-and-nozbe-one-page-to-rule-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-1556</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Lugbill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 16:48:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=277#comment-1556</guid>
		<description>OK, so I am just trying to get the hang of this.  I sent an e-mail to the Nozbe project and am having an issue.  It adds the item as a task, but it isn&#039;t parsing out my e-mail signature, or parsing out the length of time.  Here is the line in the e-mail:

* Follow up on Faithwords account creation for CSS @Computer next week %15 min

What is wrong with the formatting of this statement?  I would like this to go into the project to-do list (which it did).  However, I would like the context to be &quot;computer&quot;, the length of time required, be 15 min, and the follow-up to be next week.

Can anyone help?

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so I am just trying to get the hang of this.  I sent an e-mail to the Nozbe project and am having an issue.  It adds the item as a task, but it isn&#8217;t parsing out my e-mail signature, or parsing out the length of time.  Here is the line in the e-mail:</p>
<p>* Follow up on Faithwords account creation for CSS @Computer next week %15 min</p>
<p>What is wrong with the formatting of this statement?  I would like this to go into the project to-do list (which it did).  However, I would like the context to be &#8220;computer&#8221;, the length of time required, be 15 min, and the follow-up to be next week.</p>
<p>Can anyone help?</p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-1555</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2010 12:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-1555</guid>
		<description>Love Sharepoint. We have seen Apple surpass Microsoft because of a keen understanding of the way a &quot;consumers&quot; mind works. On the flipside, we havent yet seen Microsoft understand the way a &quot;business&quot; mind works.....politics, fear and politics....that is the main barrier to business adopting quickly.
However I beleive this is the new land of oppurtunity. Maybe Apple have paved the way..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love Sharepoint. We have seen Apple surpass Microsoft because of a keen understanding of the way a &#8220;consumers&#8221; mind works. On the flipside, we havent yet seen Microsoft understand the way a &#8220;business&#8221; mind works&#8230;..politics, fear and politics&#8230;.that is the main barrier to business adopting quickly.<br />
However I beleive this is the new land of oppurtunity. Maybe Apple have paved the way..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by SharePoint Certification for Information Workers? &#124; joelblogs</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-1553</link>
		<dc:creator>SharePoint Certification for Information Workers? &#124; joelblogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 21:55:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-1553</guid>
		<description>[...] I’ve just read a really thought-provoking blog post from Patrick Sledz (@patman2520) on Microsoft’s approach to bringing SharePoint to marke.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I’ve just read a really thought-provoking blog post from Patrick Sledz (@patman2520) on Microsoft’s approach to bringing SharePoint to marke&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Nintex Workflow for SharePoint 2010 released by Tweets that mention Nintex Workflow for SharePoint 2010 released - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/16/nintex-workflow-for-sharepoint-2010-released/comment-page-1/#comment-885</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Nintex Workflow for SharePoint 2010 released - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/2010/07/16/nintex-workflow-for-sharepoint-2010-released/#comment-885</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Colleen Moffitt, Patrick Sledz. Patrick Sledz said: New blog post: http://tinyurl.com/295rttt - Nintex Workflow for SharePoint 2010 released #SharePoint #SP2010 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Colleen Moffitt, Patrick Sledz. Patrick Sledz said: New blog post: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/295rttt" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/295rttt</a> &#8211; Nintex Workflow for SharePoint 2010 released #SharePoint #SP2010 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Prismo 1. 0. 1 &#124; mac leopard</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-884</link>
		<dc:creator>Prismo 1. 0. 1 &#124; mac leopard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 05:04:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-884</guid>
		<description>[...] Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. &#8211; Office and Business Pro... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. &#8211; Office and Business Pro&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Nicolas Georgeault</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-882</link>
		<dc:creator>Nicolas Georgeault</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 14:37:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-882</guid>
		<description>I agree with you. But is it really a business for Microsoft? Or for his partners?
I think on this way Microsoft is now trying to keep and help his more interesting partners to promote their products.
Microsoft leaves a lot of opportunity to partners to develop business strategies but they was not ready before to speak with functionals... But it will change in the near futur like with ERP systems few year ago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you. But is it really a business for Microsoft? Or for his partners?<br />
I think on this way Microsoft is now trying to keep and help his more interesting partners to promote their products.<br />
Microsoft leaves a lot of opportunity to partners to develop business strategies but they was not ready before to speak with functionals&#8230; But it will change in the near futur like with ERP systems few year ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Tom Resing</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-881</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Resing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-881</guid>
		<description>Michael,
As a MS rep, you are doing your part to support power users! Keep it up.
Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael,<br />
As a MS rep, you are doing your part to support power users! Keep it up.<br />
Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Michael Gannotti</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-880</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Gannotti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 11:10:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-880</guid>
		<description>I think that as a company there definitely needs to be a bigger push to support power users, or functionals as you call them. It is really by helping to empower these folks that we will see SharePoint really take off and in turn businesses derive increasingly greater value from their investments. I hope we will see much more of that in the year to come</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that as a company there definitely needs to be a bigger push to support power users, or functionals as you call them. It is really by helping to empower these folks that we will see SharePoint really take off and in turn businesses derive increasingly greater value from their investments. I hope we will see much more of that in the year to come</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Rene</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-879</link>
		<dc:creator>Rene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-879</guid>
		<description>I couldn&#039;t agree more with you! Way too often I feel that Microsoft&#039;s focus on SharePoint is too technical, and that they forget the &quot;Functionals&quot;.
I&#039;m in a similar position as you, and I also admire the work Michael, Dux, and Paul are doing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree more with you! Way too often I feel that Microsoft&#8217;s focus on SharePoint is too technical, and that they forget the &#8220;Functionals&#8221;.<br />
I&#8217;m in a similar position as you, and I also admire the work Michael, Dux, and Paul are doing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint Governance survey on site Closure by @Collabguy. by Michael Sampson</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/sharepoint-governance-survey-on-site-closure-by-collabguy/comment-page-1/#comment-878</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Sampson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 22:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/2010/07/08/sharepoint-governance-survey-on-site-closure-by-collabguy/#comment-878</guid>
		<description>Thanks Patrick! Appreciate you making this post for me. Kind regard,s M.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Patrick! Appreciate you making this post for me. Kind regard,s M.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Clive Davies</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-877</link>
		<dc:creator>Clive Davies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:47:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-877</guid>
		<description>Nice observation. Do hope MS do setup and support this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice observation. Do hope MS do setup and support this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. by Tweets that mention Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/why-microsoft-is-wrong-in-their-sharepoint-bring-to-market-approach/comment-page-1/#comment-876</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Why Microsoft is wrong in their SharePoint bring to market approach. - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 21:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=468#comment-876</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Sampson. Michael Sampson said: RT @patman2520: New blog post: http://tinyurl.com/35fdm2x - Why Microsoft is wrong in their #SharePoint bring to market approach. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Michael Sampson. Michael Sampson said: RT @patman2520: New blog post: <a href="http://tinyurl.com/35fdm2x" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/35fdm2x</a> &#8211; Why Microsoft is wrong in their #SharePoint bring to market approach. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on SharePoint Governance survey on site Closure by @Collabguy. by Tweets that mention SharePoint Governance survey on site Closure by @Collabguy. - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/07/08/sharepoint-governance-survey-on-site-closure-by-collabguy/comment-page-1/#comment-875</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention SharePoint Governance survey on site Closure by @Collabguy. - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jul 2010 18:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/2010/07/08/sharepoint-governance-survey-on-site-closure-by-collabguy/#comment-875</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet SharePoint. Planet SharePoint said: Patrick Sledz: #SharePoint #Governance survey on site Closure by @Collabguy. http://planetsharepoint.org/1c869a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet SharePoint. Planet SharePoint said: Patrick Sledz: #SharePoint #Governance survey on site Closure by @Collabguy. <a href="http://planetsharepoint.org/1c869a" rel="nofollow">http://planetsharepoint.org/1c869a</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Last minute : How to Best Gather Requirements for SharePoint: free seminar by @meetdux by Tweets that mention Last minute : How to Best Gather Requirements for SharePoint: free seminar by @meetdux - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/06/28/last-minute-webinar-with-meetdux/comment-page-1/#comment-869</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Last minute : How to Best Gather Requirements for SharePoint: free seminar by @meetdux - Office and Business Productivity -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 13:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=459#comment-869</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet SharePoint and Patrick Sledz, Belgian IW Usergroup. Belgian IW Usergroup said: free webinar http://wp.me/pxQts-7p How to Best Gather Requirements for SharePoint with @meetdux TODAY! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Planet SharePoint and Patrick Sledz, Belgian IW Usergroup. Belgian IW Usergroup said: free webinar <a href="http://wp.me/pxQts-7p" rel="nofollow">http://wp.me/pxQts-7p</a> How to Best Gather Requirements for SharePoint with @meetdux TODAY! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Email and Nozbe : One page to master it all by Katie Felten</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/08/using-email-and-nozbe-one-page-to-rule-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie Felten</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 02:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=277#comment-868</guid>
		<description>awesome job Patrick... I have been using nozbe for awhile now but haven&#039;t really integrated the email features your post has helped me to understand how to do this flawlessly thanks...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>awesome job Patrick&#8230; I have been using nozbe for awhile now but haven&#8217;t really integrated the email features your post has helped me to understand how to do this flawlessly thanks&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Email and Nozbe : One page to master it all by Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/08/using-email-and-nozbe-one-page-to-rule-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jun 2010 10:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=277#comment-866</guid>
		<description>I would recommend checking out &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gtdagenda.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.Gtdagenda.com&lt;/a&gt; too for an online GTD manager.

You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, schedules and a calendar.
Comes with a mobile version too, and with an Android app.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would recommend checking out <a href="http://www.gtdagenda.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.Gtdagenda.com</a> too for an online GTD manager.</p>
<p>You can use it to manage your goals, projects and tasks, set next actions and contexts, use checklists, schedules and a calendar.<br />
Comes with a mobile version too, and with an Android app.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Email and Nozbe : One page to master it all by Patrick Sledz</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/08/using-email-and-nozbe-one-page-to-rule-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-865</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sledz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 10:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=277#comment-865</guid>
		<description>Roland,

You can click on the Autocorrect Options icon that appears right after the * got converted to a bullet point. Then you can select &quot;Undo automatic bullets&quot;  or &quot;Stop Automatically Creating bullets&quot; or you can also format your email as text in stead of html or Rich Text.

Patrick</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roland,</p>
<p>You can click on the Autocorrect Options icon that appears right after the * got converted to a bullet point. Then you can select &#8220;Undo automatic bullets&#8221;  or &#8220;Stop Automatically Creating bullets&#8221; or you can also format your email as text in stead of html or Rich Text.</p>
<p>Patrick</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Using Email and Nozbe : One page to master it all by roland</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/08/using-email-and-nozbe-one-page-to-rule-it-all/comment-page-1/#comment-864</link>
		<dc:creator>roland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 23:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=277#comment-864</guid>
		<description>Patrick,

How do i get Outlook 2007 from turning my * into bullet points? My tasks then become notes.

thanks,
Roland</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Patrick,</p>
<p>How do i get Outlook 2007 from turning my * into bullet points? My tasks then become notes.</p>
<p>thanks,<br />
Roland</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The near future of Nozbe (on iPhone) looks promising. by Patrick Sledz</title>
		<link>http://www.officeandbusiness.be/nl/2010/05/01/the-near-future-of-nozbe-on-iphone-looks-promising/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Sledz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jun 2010 19:23:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.officeandbusiness.be/?p=255#comment-861</guid>
		<description>Hi Hannah,

I have used RTM for a while. For me there are some important differences between the two. One thing is, that it is extremly easy to create a Next Action in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nozbe.com/a-C8F57F9D&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nozbe&lt;/a&gt;.The way I used RTM demanded too much effort from me when I was inputting my actions. At this moment I am writing a blog post on this and hope to have it online soon. In this post I&#039;ll explain what I like in Remember The Milk and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nozbe.com/a-C8F57F9D&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Nozbe&lt;/a&gt;, what I didn&#039;t like, and why I changed from RTM to Nozbe.
Oh yes, you can create a free of charge account for Nozbe via this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.nozbe.com/a-C8F57F9D&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;. The account is limited in number of Projects and Contexts, but you can start from this free account and really SEE and DO some Nozbe GTD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hannah,</p>
<p>I have used RTM for a while. For me there are some important differences between the two. One thing is, that it is extremly easy to create a Next Action in <a href="http://www.nozbe.com/a-C8F57F9D" rel="nofollow">Nozbe</a>.The way I used RTM demanded too much effort from me when I was inputting my actions. At this moment I am writing a blog post on this and hope to have it online soon. In this post I&#8217;ll explain what I like in Remember The Milk and <a href="http://www.nozbe.com/a-C8F57F9D" rel="nofollow">Nozbe</a>, what I didn&#8217;t like, and why I changed from RTM to Nozbe.<br />
Oh yes, you can create a free of charge account for Nozbe via this <a href="http://www.nozbe.com/a-C8F57F9D" rel="nofollow">link</a>. The account is limited in number of Projects and Contexts, but you can start from this free account and really SEE and DO some Nozbe GTD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
